This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
support:company_setup [2011/02/05 16:18] jshellhaas |
support:company_setup [2011/02/05 16:21] (current) jshellhaas |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| {{:support:shifts_2.jpg|}} | {{:support:shifts_2.jpg|}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{:support:shift_definition.jpg|}} | ||
| ==== Commissions ==== | ==== Commissions ==== | ||
| Line 32: | Line 34: | ||
| As illustrated in the above example - **the approach for setting "base rates" and "incentive rates" should be designed at the same time to be in "sync" with each other and to achieve the desired mix/balance**. As an extreme example, a company could decide to set "base" rates for all offerings in the Pricing Templates at 0%, and in Shifts/Commissions set the "User-Defined Levels" as Level 1 = Good =10%, Level 2 = Better =15%, and Level 3 = Best = 20%. Each driver (in Drivers - Driver List) could be graded as Level 1,2, or 3 and would get the corresponding commission of 10%, 15%, or 20% for each and every job that they complete. | As illustrated in the above example - **the approach for setting "base rates" and "incentive rates" should be designed at the same time to be in "sync" with each other and to achieve the desired mix/balance**. As an extreme example, a company could decide to set "base" rates for all offerings in the Pricing Templates at 0%, and in Shifts/Commissions set the "User-Defined Levels" as Level 1 = Good =10%, Level 2 = Better =15%, and Level 3 = Best = 20%. Each driver (in Drivers - Driver List) could be graded as Level 1,2, or 3 and would get the corresponding commission of 10%, 15%, or 20% for each and every job that they complete. | ||
| + | {{:support:commissions.jpg|}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{:support:driver_list.jpg|}} | ||